Emil Pirchan · Tunkpapiere

Emil Pirchan ~ Komposition in Violett, Blau, Grau und Orange; um 1906-07
Wasserfarben aufgebracht im Tunkpapierverfahren auf Bütten | src Bassenge Auktion 121 Los 6874

This work, which Emil Pirchan developed using a special ink paper technique, impresses with its singular beauty. Emil Pirchan, who came from Brno and grew up in a well-off artist household, came to Vienna in 1903. The metropolis, which was currently experiencing one of its heydays, was a magnet for many artists from near and far. Back then, Pirchan studied architecture in Otto Wagner’s master class at the Academy of Fine Arts, and in the evenings he was a regular guest at the Café Museum, which was then a meeting place for the progressive artists of the Vienna Secession. Gustav Klimt, Josef Hoffmann, Koloman Moser, Josef Olbrich and also his teacher Otto Wagner met here and debated about art. Pirchan later vividly remembered the “exuberance of the feeling of belonging to a liberated new art” (Bau und Bild, Bühne und Buch. Erinnerungen an mich, Vienna 1941, unpublished manuscript).

At that time, Josef Hoffmann, Koloman Moser and Leopold Stolba, members of the Secession, were experimenting with the production of dipped paper (Tunkpapiere). They modified the process originally developed in the Orient and created poetic compositions in which birds, amphibians, fish and plants suddenly appear in recurring wave patterns. The Museum of Applied Arts in Vienna keeps an excellent collection of these paper works from the years 1903 to 1906. These works must have been a source of inspiration for the young student Emil Pirchan, who evidently immediately recognized the potential of the technique and developed it further. In the marbling technique, a sheet of paper records an “image” that was created with colors on the surface of the water in the marbling bath. While the historical marbled papers were ornamental and could be cut to size for different purposes, the sheets of the Vienna Secession were designed as images, with a specific format and a defined image area. Pirchan’s dipped papers are also designed as images, but he breaks away from representationalism. He lets the colors sometimes glide gently onto the surface, sometimes drips them into the water bath from above, perhaps with the help of a pipette. Blurred areas of color compete with circular dots of color, which expand explosively due to additional violet drops of color in their center, creating the impression of a brilliant firework display. The monotypes created in this way are therefore largely determined by chance, by the unforeseen flowing movements of the pigments. Pirchan’s abstract compositions unfold an unexpected magic and are far ahead of their time. It was only years later that Wassily Kandinsky brilliantly shattered the representational into colorful shapes and lines. / from : Bassenge Auktion 121

Emil Pirchan ~ Komposition in Mauve, Grün, Orange und Gelb; um 1906-07 | src Bassenge Auktion 121
Wasserfarben aufgebracht im Tunkpapierverfahren, grauer Stift, auf Papier, original auf Karton kaschiert.

The painter, commercial artist, architect, stage designer and writer Emil Pirchan was rediscovered in 2019 at the Museum Folkwang, Essen through an exhibition that was afterwards shown at the Leopold Museum in Vienna. The artist’s ink papers (Tunkpapiere) were a special surprise at the exhibition. They are closely linked to “Vienna around 1900”, where the artist, who was born in Brno, became a master student of the famous architect Otto Wagner in 1903. He is also closely connected to the vibrant art scene in the heart of the Austro-Hungarian monarchy through his great-cousin Josef Hoffmann, who rose to fame in 1903 as one of the co-founders of the legendary Wiener Werkstätte. Pirchan’s ink papers are unthinkable without the Vienna Secession and its willingness to experiment.

The present work, together with other inked papers by Pirchan, adorned the hall in his house in Brno. A historical photograph from 1907 shows the interior, for which Pirchan designed the entire furnishings, from the furniture to the flower vase, in the spirit of an overall concept (see exhibition catalogue Emil Pirchan. A universal artist of the 20th century, Wädenswil 2018, fig. p. 158-159, our work hangs in the top row, left). The compositions presented there in white, square frames show an effortless oscillation between closeness to nature and abstraction, a gliding and flowing of the motifs, which are sometimes reminiscent of exotic flowers and then again surprise with completely abstract, non-representational structures. Emil Pirchan’s inked papers are autonomous works that stand in their own right and are in no way inferior to Koloman Moser’s best experiments with color and form. And they give an idea of ​​how Max Ernst created his oscillating universe with curved and branched lines. / Bassenge Auktion 121

Bassenge Auktion 121 Zeichnungen des 16. bis 19. Jahrhunderts

Klimt and Flöge sisters in 1906

Anonymous. Gustav Klimt, Emilie und Helene Flöge, Litzlberg at Attersee, Austria, 1906 | src Ostlicht

Emilie Flöge spent many summers with Gustav Klimt at Lake Attersee from the 1890s on. Her sisters Pauline and Helene, with whom she opened the “Schwestern Flöge” fashion salon at Mariahilfer Strasse 1b in 1904, were often also part of the party. The salon, designed by Josef Hoffmann as a “Gesamtkunstwerk”, employed up to 80 seamstresses at the time of its greatest success and catered to the upper bourgeoisie. Helene Flöge was married to Ernst Klimt, the younger brother of Gustav Klimt, with whom he worked in a studio partnership.

This private photograph is captivating because of the contrast between the different silhouettes of the three figures, which reveals the emancipatory radicalism of the reform dress – in contrast to the usual dresses worn over a corset. Implicitly, as one might say, this also “quotes” the design element of repeated curved lines, as found in many of Gustav Klimt’s compositions. This is the only known print of this photograph [Negative number “4/93 IV” in the upper margin, handwritten annotated “Gustav Klimt Emilie Helene” in ink on the reverse.] | src Ostlicht

Allegorie von Kolo Moser

 „Ver Sacrum“ H. 1/1, 1898. Tinte, Tusche und Aquarell und weiße Deckfarbe auf Papier. | src Wikimedia, scanned from unspecified artbook
Koloman Moser :: Allegorie (1897) „Ver Sacrum“ H. 1/1, 1898. Tinte, Tusche und Aquarell und weiße Deckfarbe auf Papier. | src Wikimedia, scanned from unspecified artbook
Koloman Moser :: Ver Sacrum, 1898, Heft1. | src ÖNB

Der Wächter von Marcus Behner

Marcus Behner ~ Der Wächter. Netzätzung nach einem aquarell von Marcus Behmer. Ver Sacrum, 1903. | src ÖNB
Marcus Behner ~ The Guardian, 1901. Etching after a watercolor by Marcus Behmer. Ver Sacrum, 1903. | src ÖNB
Marcus Behner ~ Der Wächter. Netzätzung nach einem aquarell von Marcus Behmer. Ver Sacrum, 1903. | src ÖNB
Marcus Behner ~ Der Wächter, 1901. Netzätzung nach einem aquarell von Marcus Behmer. Ver Sacrum, 1903. | src ÖNB

Kostüm der Wiener Werkstätte

Edith Glogau :: Unbekannt Dame in einem Faschingskostüm der Wiener Werkstätte, Wien, vor 1929 | src MAK
Edith Glogau :: Unbekannt Dame in einem Faschingskostüm der Wiener Werkstätte, Wien, vor 1929 | src MAK
Edith Glogau :: Unbekannt Dame in einem Faschingskostüm der Wiener Werkstätte, Wien, vor 1929 | src MAK
Edith Glogau :: Unbekannt Dame in einem Faschingskostüm der Wiener Werkstätte, Wien, vor 1929 | src MAK
Edith Glogau :: Unbekannt Dame in einem Faschingskostüm der Wiener Werkstätte, Wien, vor 1929 | src MAK
Edith Glogau :: Unbekannt Dame in einem Faschingskostüm der Wiener Werkstätte, Wien, vor 1929 | src MAK
Edith Glogau :: Unbekannt Dame in einem Faschingskostüm der Wiener Werkstätte, Wien, vor 1929 | src MAK
Edith Glogau :: Unbekannt Dame in einem Faschingskostüm der Wiener Werkstätte, Wien, vor 1929 | src MAK
Edith Glogau :: Unbekannt Dame in einem Faschingskostüm der Wiener Werkstätte, Wien, vor 1929 | src MAK

Köstum der Wiener Werkstätte

Edith Glogau :: (Unbekannt) Dame in einem Faschingskostüm der Wiener Werkstätte, Wien, vor 1929 | src MAK
Edith Glogau :: (Unbekannt) Dame in einem Faschingskostüm der Wiener Werkstätte, Wien, vor 1929 | src MAK
Edith Glogau :: (Unbekannt) Dame in einem Faschingskostüm der Wiener Werkstätte, Wien, vor 1929 | src MAK
Edith Glogau :: (Unbekannt) Dame in einem Faschingskostüm der Wiener Werkstätte, Wien, vor 1929 | src MAK
Edith Glogau :: (Unbekannt) Dame in einem Faschingskostüm der Wiener Werkstätte, Wien, vor 1929 | src MAK
Edith Glogau :: (Unbekannt) Dame in einem Faschingskostüm der Wiener Werkstätte, Wien, vor 1929 | src MAK
Edith Glogau :: (Unbekannt) Dame in einem Faschingskostüm der Wiener Werkstätte, Wien, vor 1929 | src MAK
Edith Glogau :: (Unbekannt) Dame in einem Faschingskostüm der Wiener Werkstätte, Wien, vor 1929 | src MAK
Edith Glogau :: (Unbekannt) Dame in einem Faschingskostüm der Wiener Werkstätte, Wien, vor 1929 | src MAK

Bildnis. Emilie Flöge, 1902

Gustav Klimt (1862—1918) :: Bildnis Emilie Flöge, 1902. Leinwand. Ölfarbe. (oil on canvas) | src Wien Museum
Moriz Nähr (1859-1945) :: Gemälde ‘Emilie Flöge’ (1902-03) von Gustav Klimt. Schwarz-Weiß-Negativ. | src ÖNB

Mileva Roller, um 1910

Atelier d’Ora :: Austrian artist Mileva Roller (Mileva Stojsavljevic), wife of Alfred Roller, ca. 1910. [Mileva Roller, Ehefrau von Alfred Roller, um 1910]. | src Getty Images

Mileva Roller, 1910s

Dora Philippine Kallmus :: [Mileva Roller (Frau von Alfred Roller) in einem Reformkleid, Wien, um 1910.] Mileva Roller (Mileva Stojsavljevic) in a Reform dress, Vienna, ca. 1910. | src Getty Images

Exhibition of Austrian Visual Artists, 1902


Alfred Roller (1864–1935) :: XIV. Ausstellung der Vereinigung bildender Künstler Österreichs – Secession Wien. Klinger – Beethoven. (1902) | src MK&G ~ Museum für Kunst und Gewerbe (Hamburg)