Bihō Takahashi · Bat in Moon

Biho Takashi (active ca. 1890-1930) :: Bat in Moon, ca. 1905. Color woodblock print on paper | src Brooklyn Museum
Biho Takashi (active ca. 1890-1930) :: Bat in Moon / Bat against full Moon, woodblock print in colours and ink, ca. 1905. | Bukowskis

Bihō Takahashi / Nomura Yoshikuni 野村美邦 / Hirose Yoshikuni
Sealed: Yoshikuni (美邦). Signed: Yoshikuni (美邦). / Meiji Period

Bihō Takahashi :: Bat in Moon / Bat against full Moon, woodblock print in colours and ink, ca. 1905. [DETAIL] | src Bukowskis

4 women asleep and a giantess

Roland Penrose :: Four Women Asleep (Lee Miller, Adrienne Fidelin, Nusch Eluard, and Leonora Carrington), Lambe Creek, Cornwall, 1937. Print from color reversal film. © Roland Penrose Estate | src Lee Miller

Surrealist artist Mary Leonora Carrington was born at Westwood House (in Clayton Green, England) on the 6th of April in 1917; today she would have turned 106.

Leonora Carrington :: The Giantess (also, The Guardian of the Egg), 1947. Tempera on wood. Private collection of Miguel Escobedo

Lament for Icarus by Draper

Herbert James Draper (1864-1920) :: Study of Florrie Bird for Naiad in The Lament for Icarus. Black and white chalks on grey paper.
Signed ‘Herbert Draper’ (lower left), inscribed with title (centre right). | src Bonhams
Herbert Draper (1863–1920) :: The Lament for Icarus, exhibited 1898. Oil on canvas. | DETAIL
Herbert Draper (1863–1920) :: The Lament for Icarus, exhibited 1898. Oil on canvas. | Tate Britain

Girl by a Pool · Herbert Draper

Herbert James Draper :: A Young Girl by a Pool, oil on canvas, signed 'H.J.DRAPER' (lower left), probably 1892-93. | src Bonhams
Herbert James Draper :: A Young Girl by a Pool, oil on canvas, signed ‘H.J.DRAPER’ (lower left), probably 1892-93. | src Bonhams

Although not recorded in Simon Toll’s catalogue raisonné on Draper, the present lot can probably be dated to 1892-93, when the artist was working in Rome. There are a number of related studies for the work, one of which, entitled ‘Pompilia’, depicts a girl in a similar crocheted cap (illustrated p.79, no. 33). The work can also be compared with other paintings of this period, such as ‘Love in the Garden of Philetas’ (RA 1892) and ‘The Spirit of the Fountain’ (1893), where flowers and ornamental gardens appear as popular motifs. | quoted from Bonhams London

Herbert James Draper :: A Young Girl by a Pool, oil on canvas, signed 'H.J.DRAPER' (lower left), probably 1892-93. | src Bonhams | DETAIL
Herbert James Draper :: A Young Girl by a Pool, oil on canvas; probably 1892-93. (DETAIL)

Lady at a river · ink on silk

chinese art, chinese artist
Junge Dame an einem Fluss - Young lady at a river. From a collection of four Chinese silk paintings. Pen and ink on silk, heightened with watercolours and gouache; mounted on backing, partly with silk border. | src Jeschke van Vliet · Jádi Berlin
Junge Dame an einem Fluss – Young lady at a river. From a collection of four Chinese silk paintings. Pen and ink on silk, heightened with watercolours and gouache; mounted on backing, partly with silk border. | src Jeschke van Vliet · Jádi Berlin
Junge Dame an einem Fluss - Young lady at a river. From a collection of four Chinese silk paintings. Pen and ink on silk, heightened with watercolours and gouache; mounted on backing, partly with silk border. | src Jeschke van Vliet · Jádi Berlin
Junge Dame an einem Fluss – Young lady at a river. From a collection of four Chinese silk paintings. | Detail

La Marchesa Casati on canvas

Augustus Edwin John (1878 - 1961) :: La Marchesa Casati, 1919. Oil on canvas. | src AGO Collections -e-museum
Augustus Edwin John (1878 – 1961) :: La Marchesa Casati, 1919. Oil on canvas. | src AGO Collections -e-museum

Casati’s lover Augustus John painted her in this 1919 portrait, which was judged “hot stuff” by TE Lawrence and inspired a poem by Jack Kerouac.

She was said to walk around Venice at night with her pet cheetahs, naked but for a fur cloak: Luisa Casati was both an eccentric and a pioneer.

Born in Milan in 1881 and orphaned at the age of 15, Luisa Casati was to become a figure shrouded in legends as elaborate as the clothes she wore. Almost pathologically shy, she had a menagerie of pets, which included a boa constrictor she wore around her neck, white peacocks trained to perch on her windowsills and a flock of tame albino blackbirds dyed different colours to match the themes of her parties. She commissioned the costume designer of the Ballets Russes Léon Bakst to create ever more outrageous outfits, notably one made of tiny electric lightbulbs that short-circuited and gave her an electric shock so powerful it forced her into a backward somersault. And she was fascinated by the occult, always carrying a crystal ball and collecting wax replicas of herself, including one that was life-sized with a wig made from her own hair: when hosting dinner, she would sit the figure next to her and in the dim candlelight her guests struggled to make out which was the real Luisa.

Before Casati met Léon Bakst, taking her wardrobe beyond fashion, she had used couturiers like Poiret and Fortuny for her outfits.

Casati was physically striking, enhancing her features in an unusual way, as a 2003 profile in The New Yorker described. “The Marchesa was exceptionally tall and cadaverous, with a head shaped like a dagger and a little, feral face that was swamped by incandescent eyes. She brightened their pupils with belladonna and blackened their contours with kohl or India ink, gluing a two-inch fringe of false lashes and strips of black velvet to the lids,” wrote Judith Thurman in a feature accompanied by sketches by Karl Lagerfeld, a fan of Casati. “She powdered her skin a fungal white and dyed her hair to resemble a corona of flames… Her contemporaries couldn’t decide if she was a vampire, a bird of paradise, an androgyne, a goddess, an enigma, or a common lunatic.”

Artistic license

Yet Casati was not simply a flamboyant eccentric, as Mackrell reveals in her book. Her parties – and the costumes she wore for them – were choreographed performances rather than just society events, and she aimed to be ‘a living work of art’. Casati “straddled the period of belle époque decadence and early modernism, in terms of the art that she appreciated, in terms of the way that she wanted to present herself,” Mackrell tells BBC Culture. Ezra Pound immortalised her peacocks in his epic poem The Cantos and the photographer Man Ray described her as “a Surrealist version of the Medusa” after she wouldn’t stop moving in a sitting for him – Casati so loved his blurry portrait, in which she had three pairs of eyes, that she sent it to all of her friends, including her lover Gabriele d’Annuzio.

The outfit that electrocuted Casati was itself a piece of art: the bulbs were at the tips of hundreds of arrows that pierced a suit of silver armour, and by embracing modern technology it was intended to show her credentials as a Futurist (a group of artists welcoming the new age of the machine). Another outfit, worn in 1924 to the Beaumont Ball in Paris (an event with a guest list so selective that Coco Chanel was excluded for being too ‘trade’), was a homage to Picasso and the Cubists. Made entirely from wires and lights, it was too wide for the entrance to Beaumont’s ballroom: the artist Christian Bérard, who witnessed Casati attempting to squeeze through the doorway, reported that she collapsed like a “smashed zeppelin”.

While her attempts at creating art with her outfits had mixed success, Casati could inspire painters and sculptors both as muse and subject. The leader of the Futurists, Filippo Tommaso Marinetti, credited Casati with keeping his avant-garde movement alive during WWI, and had an earlier portrait of himself re-dedicated to her, adding a tribute to “the great Futurist Marchesa Casati with the languid satisfied eyes of a panther that has just devoured the bars of its cage”. Casati sat for Giovanni Boldini, who had painted Giuseppe Verdi, Sarah Bernhardt and James Whistler: when the portrait was unveiled at the 1909 Paris salon, Le Figaro praised the intensity of her “‘witch’s sabbat’ mien”. Her portrait was painted by Augustus John and Jacob Epstein sculpted her in bronze.

All of this was inextricably tied to the Casati of the gossip pages. “As ludicrous as some of her behaviour was, and as senselessly extravagant, what I love about her is there was no vulgarity about it – there was a purity to her desire to be a work of art and nothing else,” says Mackrell. “Although she loved the publicity, it was a sort of oxygen for her project – she needed an audience – she saw it the way an actor or a theatre director needs an audience, not to seek celebrity.” The rumours enhanced her status as an art patron. “If you painted her picture, or she bought one of your works, that gave you a real cachet.”

Gossip girl

Yet perhaps that isn’t the point: Casati welcomed those who would spin her excess and decadence into embroidered truth. It was said she took walks through Venice at night with her pet cheetahs, naked but for a fur cloak; that several of her servants had died after their bodies were covered in toxic gold paint. One rumour, that she commissioned wax dummies in which she kept the cremated remains of former lovers, was oddly similar to a story about her teenage heroine Cristina Trivulzio.

The Italian princess, notorious for the odd rites with which she was said to mourn dead lovers, bore similarities to Casati: an introverted child who had inherited a fortune and couldn’t fit into society. Casati attempted to contact Trivulzio’s spirit in séances, and named her own daughter Cristina. Perhaps the similarities went further than she realized: as Mackrell writes in The Unfinished Palazzo (about the Venetian palazzo in which Casati hosted some of her most spectacular soirees, later owned by Peggy Guggenheim), “Trivulzio was actually an impressive woman, a feminist of the mid-19th Century, a free thinker, writer and political activist” – yet all she became known for “were the necrophiliac rumours surrounding her sexual life”.

Casati might have deliberately fuelled outlandish tales about her life through what she did and what she wore – which included a gown of egret plumes that moulted as she moved, a headdress of white peacock feathers accessorised by the blood of a freshly slaughtered chicken, and, at the Grand Canyon, leopard-skin trousers, a sombrero and a lace veil. Yet it was a flouting of convention as much as an attempt to shock. “Everything about her was surprising – she seemed to live her life by a different set of emotional and social and visual rules from anybody else,” says Mackrell, who writes in the book how Marinetti celebrated Casati as “a warrior against mediocrity”.

“I was interested by what it is that allowed women to become exceptional or individual or free at that time… [to] live life more on their own terms rather than dictated by the men they married or the fathers they chose to remain at home with,” she says. “She was allowed to become this remarkable creature by virtue of this extraordinary wealth that she had, but also because of the fact that society was beginning to shift at the end of the 19th Century, early 20th Century – there were cracks opening up that allowed a woman like her to use her money to do something extraordinary as well – perhaps in earlier times she would have simply been crushed.”

Frock shock

While she has parallels today – Mackrell says that one obvious comparison is Lady Gaga, who also overcame shyness by using “extraordinary transformations in appearance, dress, make-up in a way to create a persona in which she could comfortably live in the world” – Casati was able to be so shocking because of the period in which she lived. “The background was still one where social and behavioural norms were so set that it was possible to be daring in a much purer way, perhaps.”

Historical events – and her profligate spending – would lead to Casati’s bankruptcy. “In the 30s the Wall Street crash, which burst the 20s bubble… completely wrecked her.” Casati owed tens of millions of pounds, and was forced to sell off all her assets. She moved to a one-bedroom flat in London, with just a few visitors (including the photographer Cecil Beaton), conducting séances and, by one account, rummaging through bins for scraps of velvet while dressed in a mangy fur hat and a scarf made of newspaper.

Casati died of a stroke in 1957, at the age of 76, and was buried with her embalmed Pekinese dog and a pair of false eyelashes. She continued to influence beyond her death: Vivien Leigh and Ingrid Bergman both played characters based on her, and she served as inspiration for fashion designers including John Galliano, Alexander McQueen and Dries Van Noten. Jack Kerouac wrote a poem about her, with the lines ‘Marchesa Casati/Is a living doll/Pinned on my Frisco/Skid row wall’. Hers was a unique appeal that survives today. “There is that sense of dancing towards the abyss,” says Mackrell. “People think those things can save them, people hang onto them when their own lives are in chaos or freefall.” -·- [quoted from BBC]

Giovanni Boldini :: Marchesa Luisa Casati with a greyhound, 1908. Oil on canvas. | src Meisterdrucke
Giovanni Boldini :: Marchesa Luisa Casati with a greyhound, 1908. Oil on canvas. | src Meisterdrucke

Geesje Kwak in Kimono, 1893-96

George Hendrik Breitner :: Girl in a White Kimono | Een meisje gekleed in een kimono, achterover liggend op een bank. Waarschijnlijk het model Geesje Kwak. | date: 1894. Oil on canvas. | src Rijksmuseum
George Hendrik Breitner :: Girl in a White Kimono | Meisje in witte kimono. Een meisje gekleed in een kimono, achterover liggend op een bank. Waarschijnlijk het model Geesje Kwak. | date: 1894. Oil on canvas. | src Rijksmuseum

Inspired by Japanese prints, between 1893 and 1896 Breitner made thirteen paintings of a girl in a kimono. She assumes different poses and the kimono often has a different colour. What catches the eye here is the embroidered, white silk kimono with red-trimmed sleeves and an orange sash. The dreamy girl is sixteen-year-old Geesje Kwak, a seamstress and one of Breitner’s regular models. [quoted from Rijksmuseum]

George Hendrik Breitner :: Girl in a red kimono (Geesje Kwak) | Meisje in rode kimono, rechts gedraaid; oil on canvas, ca. 1893. | src Kunstmuseum Den Haag
George Hendrik Breitner :: Girl in a red kimono (Geesje Kwak) | Meisje in rode kimono, rechts gedraaid; oil on canvas, ca. 1893. | src Kunstmuseum Den Haag

The Girl in a Kimono series was not a success with critics initially, but today they are considered the pinnacle of the Dutch expression of Japonisme in the fine arts. The Rijksmuseum celebrated the series in 2016 with an exhibition that brought together all of the Girl in a Kimono paintings: “Breitner: meisje in kimono”.

George Hendrik Breitner :: Girl in a red kimono (Geesje Kwak) | Meisje in rode kimono, liggend; oil on canvas, ca. 1896. Stedelijk Museum Amsterdam
George Hendrik Breitner :: Girl in a red kimono (Geesje Kwak) | Meisje in rode kimono, liggend; oil on canvas, ca. 1896. Stedelijk Museum Amsterdam
George Hendrik Breitner :: Girl in a red kimono (Geesje Kwak) | Meisje in rode kimono, links gedraaid; oil on canvas, ca. 1893. | src Beverly A. Mitchell
George Hendrik Breitner :: Girl in a red kimono (Geesje Kwak) | Meisje in rode kimono, links gedraaid; oil on canvas, ca. 1893. | src Beverly A. Mitchell

After the reopening of Japan to foreign trade in the 1850s and 1860s, European artists like Claude Monet, James McNeill Whistler and Vincent van Gogh were influenced by Japanese fine and decorative arts. One of Van Gogh’s friends and compatriots, George Hendrik Breitner, was inspired by the Japonisme trend to create a series of 13 paintings of a young girl wearing a kimono.

Breitner was born in Rotterdam in 1857. For the decade between 1876 and 1886 he studied and worked in The Hague where he explored working class areas of the city, sketching the people and places he encountered. He embraced the social realism movement and considered himself le peintre du peuple, the painter of the people. He moved to Amsterdam in 1886 where he was soon able to add photography to drawing and painting. Breitner took pictures of street life, people at work and going about their business in the city, some of the photographs reminiscent of the kind of work Jacob Riis was doing in the crowded and scary tenements of New York City at the same time.

Breitner was one of the first artists to use photos as studies for specific paintings, not just of street scenes but in the studio as well. He integrated his social realist perspective in his studio portraits, making a point of employing models from the working class. One of them was a milliner’s shopgirl named Geesje Kwak who, along with her sister Anna, posed for Breitner in around 1893-1895 when she was 16-18 years old. It was Geesje Kwak who would be immortalized as the girl in a kimono.

Japonisme had intrigued Breitner since he’d traveled to Paris in 1884. He collected Japanese woodcuts and in 1892 visited an exhibition of Japanese prints in The Hague. The show was his immediate inspiration for the kimono series. He acquired several Japanese kimonos and a pair of folding screens that he set up in his studio on the Lauriergracht canal. Geesje Kwak posed in the kimonos — one red, one white, one blue — against the backdrop of the folding screens on a bed draped in oriental rugs. She was paid for her time and there was no hanky panky going on; all strictly professional. Breitner kept meticulous records of which models posed for him when, for how long and at what rate.

Breitner’s work with Geesje Kwak ended when she emigrated to South Africa with her younger sister Niesje in 1895. Geesje died of tuberculosis in Pretoria in 1899, just shy of her 22nd birthday. quoted from The History Blog

Frühling ~ Träume II (1912)

Heinrich Vogeler :: Träume II (auch ,Frühling‘ oder ,Erwartung‘) | Dream II (also Spring or Contemplation), 1912.
Heinrich Vogeler :: Träume II (auch ,Frühling‘ oder ,Erwartung‘) | Dream II (also Spring or Contemplation), 1912. Monogrammed, inscribed and dated lower right in the coat of arms: HV W 1912. Signed and titled on the stretcher on the right: H Vogeler. Frühling. Oil on canvas. | src Grisebach · Ausgewählte Werke, 10. Juni 2021

»Kupplerin« by Otto Dix

Otto Dix :: Kupplerin, 1923. Color lithograph on machine-made paper. Signed lower right.
Otto Dix :: »Kupplerin«, 1923. Farbige Lithographie auf Maschinenbütten. Signiert unten rechts. Herausgegeben von Karl Nierendorf. | src Karl and Faber Kunstauktionen

Im Jahr 1921 zieht Otto Dix für vier Jahre nach Düsseldorf, wo er sich in druckgraphischen Techniken weiterbildet. Er liebt die Großstadt, die Typen und Randgruppen, die er vor allem während der Nacht auf den Straßen und in den Lokalen trifft: Matrosen oder Artisten, Kriegsversehrte und Kriegsgewinnler, ebenso wie Prostituierte und ihre Kunden. Die „goldenen“ Zwanziger zwischen allumfassender Traumatisierung, Vergnügungssucht und frühem Konsumismus, zwischen schillernder Oberfläche und abgestorbenem Innersten reizt ihn zu grotesk-enthüllenden Bildsujets. In seinen Werken – wie auch in der vorliegenden Lithographie „Kupplerin“ – führt Dix dem Betrachter schonungslos den körperlichen Zerfall, die Defizite und Eigenarten seiner Modelle vor Augen. Sein neuartiger Realismus, für den die Zeitgenossen den Begriff „Verismus“ prägen, macht Dix – zusammen mit Max Beckmann und George Grosz – nicht nur zum Hauptvertreter dieser Kunstströmung in Deutschland, sondern auch zu einem der bedeutendsten Realisten in der Geschichte der Kunst überhaupt.

In 1921, Otto Dix moved to Düsseldorf for four years, where he continued his education in printmaking techniques. He loves the big city, the characters and marginal groups he meets on the streets and in bars, especially at night: sailors or artists, war invalids and war profiteers, as well as prostitutes and their customers. The “golden” twenties between comprehensive traumatization, pleasure-seeking and early consumerism, between shimmering surfaces and dead innermost parts provoked him to grotesquely revealing pictorial subjects. In his works – as well as in the present lithograph “Kupplerin” – Dix ruthlessly shows the viewer the physical decay, the deficits and the peculiarities of his models. His new type of realism, for which his contemporaries coined the term “Verism”, made Dix – together with Max Beckmann and George Grosz – not only the main representative of this art movement in Germany, but also one of the most important realists in the history of art in general. (Roughly translated by us from source)